Os malefícios da "Luva Chupeta" de látex na Unidade Neonatal / The harmful effects of the latex "Glove Pacifier" in the Neonatal Unit / Los efectos nocivos del "Guante Chupete" de látex em La Unidad Neonatal

Na Iniciativa Hospital Amigo da Criança-Neofoi proposto o uso da chupeta na Unidade Neonatal (UN) de modo terapêutico, e sempre com supervisão de um profissional de saúde. Mas observa-se que o aparato conhecido como "Luva Chupeta" fabricado com o uso de uma luva de látex está sendo utilizado como alternativa para acalentar o recém-nascido (RN). Apesar de poucos estudos, é evidente que esse dispositivo deve ser contraindicado na UN, uma vez que pode provocar alergia ao látex, transmitir infecções, provocar acidentes graves como aspiração laringotraqueal do algodão devido ao rompimento da luva de látex, e dependendo do tamanho do material, obstruir as vias aéreas, e levar a óbito. Além do mais, o dispositivo pode interferir negativamente no crescimento e no desenvolvimento craniofacial e causar prejuízos associados à amamentação e na saúde materno infantil. A substituição da "Luva Chupeta" por outras estratégias, até mesmo pela chupeta convencional ou ortodôntica, para lidar com a dor e situações de estresse do RN deve ser decisiva para evitar os riscos de acidentes graves. O Protocolo de uso de bicos, Protocolo de manejo da dor do RN, adoção do Método Canguru na UN para promoção do desenvolvimento e comportamento do RN, e a capacitação/monitoramento das práticas adotas pela Equipe Materno Infantil, quanto ao cuidado ofertado são alternativas mais complexas, mas que devem ser analisadas por aqueles que desejam oferecer confiabilidade aos seus processos institucionais. (AU)

In the Baby-Friendly Hospital-Neo Initiative, the use of pacifiers in the Neonatal Unit (UN) was proposed in a therapeutic way, and always under the supervision of a health professional. However, it should be noted that the device known as "Pacifier Glove" manufactured using a latex glove is being used as an alternative to cherish the newborn. Despite few studies, it is clear that this device should be contraindicated in the UN, since it can cause allergy to latex, transmit infections, cause serious accidents such as laryngotracheal aspiration of cotton due to the rupture of the latex glove, and depending on the size of the material, obstruct the airways, and lead to death. Furthermore, the device may interfere with craniofacial growth and development and cause harm associated with breastfeeding and maternal and child health. The substitution of the "Pacifier Glove" for other strategies, even for the conventional or orthodontic pacifier, to deal with the pain and stress situations of the baby should be avoided to avoid the risk of serious accidents.The teat use protocol, the baby's pain management protocol, the adoption of the Kangaroo Method in the neonatal unit to promote the baby's development and behavior, and the training/monitoring of the practices adopted by the Maternal and Child Team, regarding the care offered, are alternatives more complex, but which must be analyzed by those who wish to offer reliability to their institutional processes. (AU)

En la Iniciativa Hospital Amigo del Niño-Neo, se propuso terapéuticamente el uso del chupete en la Unidad Neonatal (UN), y siempre bajo la supervisión de un profesional de la salud. Pero se observa que el dispositivo conocido como "chupete Gluva", fabricado con el uso de un guante de látex, está siendo utilizado como una alternativa para cuidar al recién nacido (NB). A pesar de los pocos estudios, es evidente que este dispositivo debe estar contraindicado en la NU, ya que puede causar alergia al látex, transmitir infecciones, ocasionar accidentes graves como aspiración laringotraqueal de algodón por rotura del guante de látex, y dependiendo de la El tamaño del material obstruye las vías respiratorias y provoca la muerte. Además, el dispositivo puede interferir negativamente con el crecimiento y desarrollo craneofacial y causar daños asociados con la lactancia materna y la salud maternoinfantil. La sustitución del "Dummy Glove" por otras estrategias, incluso el chupete convencional u ortodóncico, para hacer frente a las situaciones de dolor y estrés del RN debe ser determinante para evitar el riesgo de accidentes graves. El Protocolo de Uso del Pezón, el Protocolo de Manejo del Dolor del RN, la adopción del Método Canguro en la NU para promover el desarrollo y comportamiento del RN, y la capacitación/seguimiento de las prácticas adoptadas por el Equipo Materno Infantil, en cuanto a los cuidados ofrecidos, son más alternativas eficientes, complejas, pero que deben ser analizadas por quienes deseen brindar confiabilidad a sus procesos institucionales. (AU)

Reações de hipersensibilidade a vacinas / Hypersensitivity reactions to vaccines

O desenvolvimento e a ampliação do uso das vacinas durante décadas contribuíram para o controle e erradicação de doenças infecciosas, causando um grande impacto na saúde pública no mundo. A análise de segurança das vacinas percorre criteriosos processos e fases dos estudos clínicos, um dos pilares essenciais para aprovação regulatória e utilização do produto na população. O evento supostamente atribuído à vacinação e imunização (ESAVI), terminologia atual, é definido como qualquer ocorrência médica indesejada após a vacinação que possui, ou não, uma relação causal com o uso de uma vacina ou outro imunobiológico. Cabe ressaltar que eventos adversos mais raros ou inesperados, incluindo os eventos de hipersensibilidade, poderão ocorrer na fase pós-comercialização, quando as vacinas são aplicadas em milhões de pessoas. Neste artigo, serão discutidos os principais aspectos relacionados aos eventos adversos de hipersensibilidade pós-vacinais de interesse do especialista, e os desafios frente ao reconhecimento do agente causal e conduta a ser adotada. Além disso, serão revisados os potenciais alérgenos presentes nas vacinas de uso rotineiro para auxiliar o profissional de saúde na identificação de pacientes com potencial de risco de ESAVI por tais componentes. A atualização do conhecimento acerca da segurança e dos benefícios das vacinas pelos profissionais de saúde, sobretudo em populações especiais, contribui para condutas em imunização mais apropriadas, reduzindo o risco de exposição a um possível alérgeno em pessoas comprovadamente alérgicas às vacinas ou a alguns dos seus componentes, além de evitar contraindicações desnecessárias em eventos coincidentes ou não graves.

The expansion of vaccine use and development in recent decades has contributed to the control and eradication of infectious diseases, causing a major impact on public health worldwide. Vaccine safety analysis, which involves careful processes and clinical study, is one of the essential pillars of regulatory approval and use in the population. In current terminology, events supposedly attributable to vaccination and immunization (ESAVI) are defined as any unwanted medical occurrence after vaccination that may or may not have a causal relationship with vaccines or other immunobiologicals. It is noteworthy that rare or unexpected adverse events, including hypersensitivity, can occur during the post-marketing phase, when vaccines are administered to millions of people. In this article, we will discuss the main aspects of post-vaccine hypersensitivity events of interest to specialists and challenges to recognizing the causal agent and appropriate clinical practice. Potential allergens in routine vaccines will also be reviewed to help health professionals identify patients with a potential risk of ESAVI due to such components. Updating health professionals' knowledge about the safety and benefits of vaccines, particularly in special populations, can contribute to more appropriate clinical practice regarding immunization, reducing the risk of exposure to possible allergens in people with allergies to vaccines or their components, avoiding unnecessary contraindications in coincidental or non-serious events.

Atualização em reações de hipersensibilidade aos anestésicos locais / Update on local anesthetics hypersensitivity reactions

Os anestésicos locais são essenciais em diversos procedimentos médicos e odontológicos. Funcionam estabilizando as membranas neuronais e inibindo a transmissão de impulsos neurais, o que permite a realização desses procedimentos com mais segurança e sem dor. As reações adversas a drogas são definidas pela Organização Mundial da Saúde como todos os efeitos nocivos, não intencionais e indesejáveis de uma medicação, que ocorrem em doses usadas para prevenção, diagnóstico e tratamento. As reações de hipersensibilidade são reações adversas do tipo B, imprevisíveis, que clinicamente se assemelham a reações alérgicas e podem ou não envolver um mecanismo imune. As reações de hipersensibilidade verdadeiras aos anestésicos locais são raras, apesar de superestimadas. Nesta revisão destacamos a necessidade de uma avaliação completa dos pacientes com suspeita de reação alérgica aos anestésicos locais, incluindo a investigação de outros possíveis alérgenos que tenham sido utilizados no procedimento, como analgésicos, antibióticos e látex. A estratégia de investigação e seleção de pacientes para testes deve se basear na história clínica. Dessa forma, poderemos fornecer orientações mais assertivas e seguras aos pacientes.

Local anesthetics are essential in many medical and dental procedures. They work by stabilizing neuronal membranes and inhibiting the transmission of neural impulses, which allows these procedures to be performed more safely and without pain. Adverse drug reactions are defined by the World Health Organization as all harmful, unintended and undesirable effects of a medication, which occur at doses used for prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Hypersensitivity reactions are unpredictable type B adverse reactions that clinically resemble allergic reactions and may or may not involve an immune mechanism. True hypersensitivity reactions to local anesthetics are rare, although overestimated. In this review, we highlight the need for a thorough evaluation of patients with suspected allergic reaction to local anesthetics, including investigation of other possible allergens that may have been used in the procedure, such as analgesics, antibiotics and latex. The investigation strategy and patient selection for testing should be based on clinical history. In this way, we will be able to provide more assertive and safe guidelines to patients.

Anafilaxia no primeiro ano de vida: como diagnosticar / Anaphylaxis in the first year of life: how to diagnose

A anafilaxia é uma reação alérgica mais grave e potencialmente fatal. Apresenta-se quase sempre com manifestações cutâneas, acompanhadas por acometimento dos sistemas respiratório, gastrointestinal, nervoso e cardiovascular. Indivíduos de todas as faixas etárias podem manifestar anafilaxia, e seu diagnóstico no primeiro ano de vida é difícil por ser o lactente incapaz de expressar de modo claro as sensações vividas durante o episódio agudo. Nessa faixa etária os alimentos são os agentes desencadeantes mais envolvidos, embora medicamentos e veneno de himenópteros também o sejam. Em pacientes submetidos a várias cirurgias e procedimentos médicos a alergia ao látex pode ocorrer. A adrenalina intramuscular é a primeira linha de tratamento da anafilaxia na fase inicial, mas continua sendo subutilizada. Além disso, medidas de suporte, tais como decúbito supino, reposição de fluidos, vias aéreas pérvias e oxigenação, devem ser instituídas. Após a alta, o paciente deve ser encaminhado à avaliação e seguimento por especialista visando à identificação do agente desencadeante, assim como educar responsáveis/cuidadores destes pacientes sobre a prevenção de novos episódios. É importante que esse paciente tenha consigo algum tipo de identificação que o aponte como tendo tido episódio de anafilaxia, sobretudo se tiver sido recorrente. A oferta de um plano escrito de como proceder diante de um novo episódio é fundamental.

Anaphylaxis is a serious and potentially fatal allergic reaction. Most frequently, it features cutaneous manifestations accompanied by involvement of the respiratory, gastrointestinal, nervous, and/or cardiovascular systems. Individuals of all age groups may present with anaphylaxis, and its diagnosis in the first year of life is difficult because the infant is unable to clearly express the sensations experienced during the acute episode. In this age group, foods are the most common triggering agents, together with medications and Hymenoptera venom. In patients undergoing multiple surgeries and medical procedures, latex allergy may occur. Intramuscular epinephrine is the first line of treatment for early anaphylaxis, but it remains underutilized. In addition, supportive measures such as supine decubitus, fluid replacement, patent airways, and oxygenation should be instituted. After discharge, the patient should be referred for evaluation and follow-up by a specialist, with the purpose of identifying the triggering agent as well as educating the caregivers of these patients about the prevention of new episodes. This patient should always carry some type of identification that indicates that he/she has had any episode of anaphylaxis, especially if it has been recurrent. Providing a written plan of how to proceed in the face of a new episode is essential.

Prevalencia de sensibilidad y alergia al látex en médicos de un programa de residencia de un hospital pediátrico de Buenos Aires / Prevalence of latex sensitivity and allergy among physicians of a residency program in a children ́s hospital of Buenos Aires

Introducción. Publicaciones internacionales estiman una prevalencia de sensibilización al látex (SL) en el personal de salud del 7 % al 17 %, y se desconocen los valores en la Argentina.Objetivos. Estimar la prevalencia de sensibilización y alergia al látex en médicos residentes de un hospital pediátrico mediante la prueba epicutánea de lectura inmediata y evaluar factores de riesgo asociados en dicha población.Población y métodos. Estudio de corte transversal. Se incluyeron los residentes, jefes e instructores de Pediatría, Ortopedia, Cirugía y Terapia Intensiva entre junio y octubre de 2017. En todos, se realizó un cuestionario (que evaluó enfermedades atópicas y otros factores de riesgo) y la prueba epicutánea de lectura inmediata. En un subgrupo (residentes de 1ero, 4to año, especialidades quirúrgicas y terapia) se dosó inmunoglobulina E total y específica para látex.Resultados. Se incluyeron 113 participantes. La prevalencia de SL fue del 7,96 % (intervalo de confianza del 95 %: 3,70-14,58); 4 participantes resultaron alérgicos al látex. El antecedente de síntomas relacionados con el látex se asoció significativamente con prueba epicutánea de lectura inmediata + (p = 0,0196; odds ratio 6,13; intervalo de confianza del 95 %: 1,44-26,04). No hubo asociación entre SL y año de residencia.Conclusiones. La prevalencia de SL hallada fue del 7,9 %. Se evidenció una relación significativa entre el antecedente de SRL y un resultado de prueba epicutánea de lectura inmediata positiva

Introduction. International publications estimate a 7 %-17 % latex sensitization (LS) prevalence among health care workers, but values in Argentina are unknown.Objectives. To estimate the prevalence of latex sensitization and allergy among residents of a children's hospital using the immediate-reading prick test and to assess associated risk factors in this population.Population and methods. Cross-sectional study. Residents, trainers, and Chief residents of the Departments of Pediatrics, Orthopedics, Surgery and Intensive Care were included between June and October 2017. All of them were administered a questionnaire (assessing atopic diseases and other risk factors) and underwent the immediate-reading prick test. Total and latex-specific immunoglobulin E levels were determined in a subgroup of individuals (first- and fourth-year residents, surgical specialties, and intensive care).Results. A total of 113 participants were included. LS prevalence was 7.96 % (95 % confidence interval: 3.70-14.58); 4 participants were allergic to latex. A history of latex-related symptoms (LRS) was significantly associated with a positive result in the immediate-reading prick test (p = 0.0196; odds ratio: 6.13; 95 % confidence interval: 1.44-26.04). There was no association between LS and the year of the residency program.Conclusions. The observed LS prevalence was 7.9 %. There was a significant relation between a history of LRS and a positive result in the immediate-reading prick tes

Management of catheter-associated urethral strictures

Background: Urethral stricture is an abnormal narrowing or loss of distensibility of any segment of the urethra surrounded by corpus spongiosum. In the last two decades, there has been a change in the pattern of aetiology of urethral stricture in urban centres in Nigeria with a shift away from post-infective strictures to the emergence of traumatic and iatrogenic causes.Objective: This study aims to present our observation of the occurrence of long-segment urethral strictures in patients after urethral catheter placement for various indications.Methodology: This is a descriptive, cross sectional report of patients who presented to and were managed at the Urology Unit of a tertiary hospital in North-Western Nigeria. Relevant information were retrieved from patients' case notes and the data was entered into a proforma and analysed using the SPSS 20 software.Results: The mean age of the patients was 45.4 ± 19.4 years, with a range of 11-80 years. Indications for urethral catheterization were acute urine retention 11 (43.8%), intra-operative urine output monitoring 9 (28.1%), following road traffic accident 10(31.2%), unconsciousness secondary to meningitis 1 (3.1%) and after urologic surgery 1 (3.1%). Urethral catheterization was carried out in peripheral hospitals in 19 (56.3%) patients; and from the hospitals operating room in 10 (31.2%), accident and emergency room 2 (6.3%) and trauma centre 1 (3.1%). Strictures were panurethral in 22 (68.75%), in the bulbar urethra in 6 (18.75%) and in the penile urethra 4 (12.5%). The length of strictures ranged from 1 cm to 20 cm. Treatments offered included substitution urethroplasty using oral mucosa grafts (OMG) urethroplasty 30 (93.8%), fasciocutaneous penile flap 1 (3.1%) and direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU)1 (3.1%). Satisfactory voiding was recorded in 28 (87.5%), voiding was unsatisfactory in 2 (6.3%), while one patient had stricture recurrence and another one is awaiting second stage repair.Conclusion: Urethral catheterization is an emerging cause of panurethral strictures in our practice and may occur even after relief of acute urine retention but more worrisome following short-term catheterization during surgery. There is need for evaluation of the quality of silicone-coated latex urethral catheters currently available

Uma visão atualizada da anafilaxia idiopática: a ausência de evidência não é a evidência de ausência / An updated view of idiopathic anaphylaxis: absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

A anafilaxia idiopática não apresenta etiologia conhecida. A sua prevalência é estimada entre 10-35% de todas as modalidades de anafilaxia. A sintomatologia apresentada é a mesma de qualquer outra anafilaxia: urticária, angioedema, ruborização, prurido, hipotensão arterial, taquicardia, manifestações gastrointestinais (disfagia, náusea, vômitos, cólicas abdominais, diarreia), asma, edema laríngeo, tontura e síncope. A mortalidade é rara. Não há transmissão genética, mas 40% dos pacientes são atópicos. É mais frequente nos adultos do que nas crianças, e principalmente em mulheres. É um diagnóstico de exclusão. Ocorre ativação mastocitária com desgranulação citoplasmática dos mediadores de anafilaxia (triptase, histamina, entre outros). É uma anafilaxia com boa resposta aos corticoides, e, portanto, caso não haja resposta adequada a doses eficazes de prednisona/prednisolona, o seu diagnóstico deve ser revisto. O diagnóstico diferencial da anafilaxia idiopática inclui: a mastocitose sistêmica indolente, síndromes de ativação mastocitária monoclonais, alergia à galactose-alfa-1,3 galactose, anafilaxia induzida por exercícios (com e sem dependência alimentar e medicamentosa), angioedema hereditário (congênito e adquirido), feocromocitoma, síndrome carcinoide, anafilaxia oral acarina, alergia ao Anisakis simplex, disfunção das cordas vocais, síndrome escombroide, alergia ao sêmen, alergia ao látex, manifestações psicossomáticas (síndrome do pânico, globus hystericus e a síndrome de Münchausen), bem como as tradicionais e mais frequentes modalidades de anafilaxia (alergia a alimentos, medicamentos e insetos). O tratamento na crise aguda da anafilaxia idiopática é o mesmo do que nas demais anafilaxias, incluindo a administração intramuscular imediata de epinefrina. Deve haver uma generosa e prolongada prescrição de corticoterapia oral, e também a instituição de medicação preventiva (anti-histamínicos anti- H1 e anti-H2, cetotifeno, albuterol oral, montelucaste, cromoglicato de sódio, e por último o omalizumabe). Os pacientes devem portar epinefrina autoinjetora e ser instruídos sobre como agir em caso de um episódio anafilático. Eles respondem bem à administração de epinefrina. A corticoterapia oral, por 4-6 semanas, pode induzir uma remissão completa.

Idiopathic anaphylaxis is a condition of unknown etiology. Its prevalence ranges from 10 to 35% of all cases of anaphylaxis. Clinical symptoms and signs are those of classic anaphylaxis, including urticaria, angioedema, flushing, itching, hypotension, tachycardia, gastrointestinal manifestations (dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea), asthma, laryngeal edema, dizziness, and syncope. Mortality is rare. There is no genetic transmission, but about 40% of patients are atopic. It is more common in adults than in children, affecting mainly women. It is considered a diagnosis of exclusion of other known forms of anaphylaxis. Mast cell activation occurs with cytoplasmatic degranulation of mediators of anaphylaxis (tryptase and histamine, among others). Because idiopathic anaphylaxis is a steroid-responsive condition, if it is not controlled with adequate doses of prednisone/prednisolone, the diagnosis should be challenged. The differential diagnosis of idiopathic anaphylaxis includes indolent systemic mastocytosis, clonal mast cell activation syndromes, galactose-alpha-1,3- galactose allergy, exercise-induced anaphylaxis (both food- and drug-dependent and -independent), hereditary angioedema (congenital and acquired), pheochromocytoma, carcinoid syndrome, oral mite anaphylaxis, Anisakis simplex allergy, vocal cord dysfunction, scombroid poisoning, semen allergy, latex allergy, psychosomatic conditions (panic attacks, globus hystericus, and Münchausen syndrome), and the classic forms of anaphylaxis (food, drug, and insect allergies). Treatment of acute idiopathic anaphylaxis is the same as in the other forms of anaphylaxis, including intramuscular epinephrine, but with prolonged oral corticosteroid therapy. It might also include other oral preventive medications (H1 and H2 antihistamines, ketotifen, oral albuterol, montelukast, sodium cromoglycate, and recently omalizumab). Patients should have an epinephrine auto-injector and be instructed on self-management of anaphylaxis. Good response to epinephrine is observed, and oral corticosteroid therapy for 4-6 weeks can induce complete remission.

Vasoespasmo coronario en un niño alérgico al látex: síndrome de Kounis / Coronary vasospasm in a child allergic to latex: Kounis syndrome

El síndrome de Kounis consiste en la aparición simultánea de anafilaxia y síndrome coronario agudo. Se trata de una entidad poco descrita y que puede estar infradiagnosticada en pediatría. Es crucial, por su presentación variable, atípica e inesperada, y por sus posibles complicaciones graves (arritmias ventriculares, infarto de miocardio, muerte súbita), su reconocimiento y tratamiento precoz, dirigido a la revascularización del miocardio y al tratamiento de la reacción anafiláctica concomitante. Se presenta el caso de un varón de 11 años que, tras el contacto con látex, presentó una reacción anafiláctica asociada a vasoespasmo coronario, con recuperación rápida y completa con la administración de adrenalina intramuscular. El estudio cardiológico descartó patología coronaria como causa del evento. El estudio alergológico puso de manifiesto un síndrome de reactividad cruzada látex-frutas (kiwi y piña). Se diagnosticó síndrome de Kounis tipo i desencadenado por látex, y se recomendó evitar posibles factores desencadenantes.

Kounis syndrome consists of the simultaneous occurrence of anaphylaxis and acute coronary syndrome. It is a rare entity that may be underdiagnosed in paediatrics. The clinical presentation is variable, atypical and usually unexpected, and it carries possible serious complications such as ventricular arrhythmias, myocardial infarction and sudden death. Therefore, an early diagnosis and treatment for myocardial revascularization and the anaphylactic reaction are crucial. We report the case of an 11-year-old male who, after contact with latex, presented an anaphylactic reaction associated with coronary vasospasm, with rapid and complete recovery after administration of intramuscular adrenaline. The cardiological study ruled out coronary pathology as the cause of the event. The allergy study revealed a latex-fruit (kiwi and pineapple) cross-reactivity syndrome. The patient was diagnosed with type I Kounis syndrome triggered by latex, recommending the avoidance of possible triggers.

Anaphylaxis triggered by prick test with latex extract: a case report

ABSTRACT CONTEXT: Adverse reactions associated with prick tests are rare but may be present as serious systemic reactions. CASE REPORT: A 38-year-old female nursing technician complained of three episodes of anaphylaxis in one year, all in the workplace. To investigate latex allergy, the patient underwent the prick test with latex, and immediately developed a rash, itchy skin, hoarseness, dyspnea and dry cough. Her condition improved promptly after appropriate measures were established for controlling her anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: The skin test must be performed under medical supervision, since complications that can lead to life-threatening reactions, if support measures are not readily implemented, have been attributed to this test.

Consenso Brasileiro sobre Alergia Alimentar: 2018 - Parte 1 - Etiopatogenia, clínica e diagnóstico. Documento conjunto elaborado pela Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria e Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia / Brazilian Consensus on Food Allergy: 2018 - Part 1 - Etiopathogenesis, clinical features, and diagnosis. Joint position paper of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics and the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology

A alergia alimentar é definida como uma doença consequente a uma resposta imunológica anômala, que ocorre após a ingestão e/ou contato com determinado(s) alimento(s). Atualmente é considerada um problema de saúde pública, pois a sua prevalência tem aumentado no mundo todo. É um capítulo à parte entre as reações adversas a alimentos, e de acordo com os mecanismos fisiopatológicos envolvidos, essas reações podem ser imunológicas ou não-imunológicas. Em geral, a alergia alimentar inicia precocemente na vida com manifestações clínicas variadas na dependência do mecanismo imunológico envolvido. A anafilaxia é a forma mais grave de alergia alimentar mediada por IgE. Conhecimentos recentes permitiram a melhor caracterização da Síndrome da enterocolite induzida por proteína alimentar (FPIES), assim como da esofagite eosinofílica. Vários fatores de risco, assim como novos alérgenos alimentares, têm sido identificados nos últimos anos. Tomando-se como ponto de partida o "Consenso Brasileiro sobre Alergia Alimentar: 2007" foi realizada revisão e atualização dos conceitos apresentados por grupo de alergologistas, gastroenterologistas, nutrólogos e pediatras especializados no tratamento de pacientes com alergia alimentar. Novos conceitos foram apresentados sobretudo pela melhor caracterização. O objetivo desta revisão foi elaborar um documento prático capaz de auxiliar na compreensão dos mecanismos envolvidos na alergia alimentar, assim como dos possíveis fatores de risco associados à sua apresentação, bem como sobre a sua apresentação clínica.

Food allergy is defined as a disease resulting from an anomalous immune response that occurs after ingestion of and/or contact with certain foods. It is currently considered a public health problem because of its increased prevalence worldwide. Food allergy is a major entity among adverse reactions to foods; depending on the pathophysiological mechanisms involved, these reactions may be immunological or non-immunological. In general, food allergy starts early in life with varied clinical manifestations depending on the immune mechanism involved. Anaphylaxis is the most severe form of IgE-mediated food allergy. Recent knowledge has allowed to better characterize food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES), as well as eosinophilic esophagitis. Several risk factors as well as new food allergens have been identified in recent years. Taking the 2007 Brazilian Consensus on Food Allergy as a starting point, the concepts presented were reviewed and updated by a group of allergologists, gastroenterologists, nutrologists and pediatricians specialized in the treatment of patients with food allergy. The objective of this review was to develop a hands-on document capable of helping improve the understanding of the mechanisms involved in food allergy, possible associated risk factors, as well as clinical presentation.

Aplicações práticas de uma plataforma multiplex para detecção de IgE específica por componentes alergênicos em doenças alérgicas / Practical applications of a multiplex platform for specific IgE detection based on allergenic components in allergic diseases

As doenças alérgicas destacam-se entre as principais doenças crônicas não transmissíveis das últimas décadas. O avanço da biologia molecular, por sua vez, permite melhor compreensão sobre os mecanismos envolvidos na fisiopatologia das doenças, e consequente aprimoramento no diagnóstico. A identificação de componentes alergênicos específicos, recombinantes ou purificados, possibilita um conhecimento mais específico do perfil de sensibilização do paciente alérgico, inferindo informações relevantes na investigação de alergias mediadas por IgE. Paralelamente, a utilização de plataformas multiplex viabiliza a detecção simultânea de dezenas de componentes alergênicos, otimizando a investigação de pacientes polissensibilizados. A compreensão de instrumentos laboratoriais que permitam detectar a presença de IgE, suas vantagens, desvantagens e aplicabilidade clínica são fundamentais para melhor controle do paciente alérgico e manejo terapêutico. Esta revisão tem como objetivo descrever os principais dados publicados sobre o papel das plataformas multiplex (ImmunoCAP ISAC®) em diferentes situações clínicas relacionadas a doenças alérgicas.

Allergic diseases have been among the most common chronic non-communicable diseases over the past decades. Advances in the field of molecular biology, in turn, have allowed to better understand the mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of allergic diseases and thus improve diagnosis. The identification of specific recombinant or purified protein components enables a deeper knowledge of the sensitization profile of allergic patients, suggesting relevant information when screening for IgE-mediated allergy. In the meantime, multiplex platforms allow simultaneous detection of several protein components, optimizing the investigation of polysensitized patients. Understanding laboratory tools that are able to detect the presence of IgE, their advantages, disadvantages and clinical applicability, is paramount to improve symptom control and therapeutic management in allergic patients. In this review, we aimed to describe the main data available on the role of multiplex platforms (ImmunoCAP ISAC®) in different allergy-related clinical situations.

Estrategias para el cumplimiento del programa de formación en tres médicos residentes de Pediatría con alergia al látex / Strategies for compliance with the internship program among three pediatric interns with latex allergy

Introducción. La alergia al látex es frecuente en ámbitos hospitalarios. Objetivo. Describir la situación clínica de tres residentes de Pediatría con alergia al látex y las estrategias de prevención en las rotaciones de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica y Neonatal. Pacientes, métodos y resultados. Las tres profesionales manifestaron exacerbación de síntomas durante la residencia. Se confirmó el diagnóstico con historia compatible e inmunoglobulina E específica positiva. Se realizó una entrevista semiestructurada para describir sus percepciones en relación con las estrategias de prevención, se capacitó al personal y se incorporaron guantes de nitrilo para los procedimientos. Las residentes realizaron las rotaciones sin presentar manifestaciones alérgicas. Refirieron como aspectos positivos sentirse cuidadas y mejor calidad de vida; como aspectos negativos, mala predisposición y resistencia al cambio en algunos compañeros. Las estrategias diseñadas permitieron que las residentes pudieran continuar su programa de formación.

Introduction. Latex allergy is common in the hospital setting. Objective. To describe the clinical situation of three pediatric interns with latex allergy and the prevention strategies implemented during clinical clerkships in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units. Patients, methods, and outcomes. The three interns referred symptom exacerbation during their internship program. Diagnosis was confirmed based on a compatible history and positive specific immunoglobulin E. A semi-structured interview was done to describe perceptions about prevention strategies, the personnel were trained, and nitrile gloves were provided for carrying out procedures. Interns completed their clinical clerkships without having allergic reactions. Positive aspects referred by interns were that they felt cared for and experienced an improved quality of life; negative aspects were a bad predisposition and resistance against change among some other interns. Strategies designed to this end permitted interns to continue their internship program.

IgE, IgG4 e IgA específicas na alergia ao látex / Specific IgE, IgG4, and IgA in latex allergy

Objetivo: A alergia ao látex é considerada um problema mundial de saúde por estar associada a reações potencialmente fatais. O objetivo principal deste estudo é identificar fatores clínico-laboratoriais associados à sensibilização e alergia ao látex, avaliando as concentrações de IgE, IgG4 e IgA específicas nestas condições. Métodos: Estudo observacional transversal em uma coorte de 400 crianças e adolescentes com defeito do fechamento do tubo neural. Os pacientes realizaram entrevista clínica e foram submetidos a coleta de sangue periférico para a detecção dos níveis séricos de IgE, IgG4 e IgA específicas para látex. As prevalências de sensibilização e alergia ao látex foram calculadas e as variáveis clínico-laboratoriais coletadas foram analisadas. Resultados: A prevalência de sensibilização e de alergia ao látex em pacientes com defeito de fechamento do tubo neural foi de 33,2% e 12,2%, respectivamente. As manifestações clínicas de alergia ao látex mais frequentes foram as cutâneas (79,6%), mas anafilaxia foi observada em 4,75% dos pacientes. Os fatores clínico-cirúrgicos associados à alergia ao látex foram identificados e um escore de sintomas para rastrear os pacientes foi desenvolvido. A concentração de IgE sérica específica para látex ≥ 0,77 kUA/L tem boa acurácia para diferenciar os pacientes sensibilizados assintomáticos dos alérgicos. As dosagens de IgE sérica específica para alérgenos recombinantes também apresentaram boa acurácia no diagnóstico da alergia. Conclusões: Maior concentração de IgE específica para látex e Hevb5, menor concentração de IgG4 específica para látex e escore de sintomas ≥ 40% estiveram associados com alergia ao látex.

Objective: Latex allergy is considered a global health problem because it is associated with life-threatening reactions. The main objective of this study was to identify clinical and laboratory factors associated with sensitization and allergy to latex, assessing the concentrations of latex-specific IgE, IgG4, and IgA. Methods: This was an observational study of a cohort of 400 children and adolescents with neural tube closure defect. Patients underwent a clinical interview and had their blood drawn for the measurement of serum levels of latex-specific IgE, IgG4, and IgA. The prevalence rates of sensitization and allergy to latex were calculated, and clinical and laboratory variables were analyzed. Results: The prevalence rates of sensitization and allergy to latex in patients with neural tube closure defects were 33.2 and 12.2%, respectively. Cutaneous manifestations of latex allergy were the most common ones (79.6%), but anaphylaxis was observed in 4.75% of the patients. Clinical and surgical factors associated with latex allergy were identified, and a symptom scoring system was developed as a screening tool. A latex-specific IgE concentration ≥ 0.77 kUA/L showed good accuracy to differentiate between asymptomatic sensitization and allergy. The measurement of specific IgE to recombinant allergens also showed good accuracy in the diagnosis of allergy. Conclusions: Higher concentrations of latex-specific IgE and Hevb5, lower concentrations of latex-specific IgG4, and a symptom score ≥ 40% were associated with latex allergy.

Alergia al látex en un hospital pediátrico: Caracterización y factores de riesgo / Latex allergy in a paediatric hospital: Characteristics and risk factors

Introducción: La prevalencia de sensibilización al látex es variable. Se describen diversos factores de riesgo para la sensibilización al látex, como riesgo genético, atopia y múltiples intervenciones quirúrgicas. Objetivo: Caracterizar los pacientes con sospecha de alergia al látex, analizar sus características clínicas y factores de riesgo. Pacientes y método: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo, en niños derivados a la Unidad de Inmunología pediátrica por sospecha de alergia al látex y para confirmación diagnóstica. Se revisaron síntomas por contacto o exposición a materiales con látex. Se identificó factores de riesgo para la sensibilización al látex: patologías con múltiples intervenciones quirúrgicas (espina bífida, mielomeningocele, escoliosis y alteraciones nefrourológicas), atopia (rinitis o asma, dermatitis atópica), y se realizó prick test y/o IgE específica para látex. Se efectuó un modelo de regresión logística multivariado para asociar síntomas de exposición al látex con enfermedades de base y condiciones de riesgo. Resultados: Se reclutaron 106 pacientes, de los cuales 50 fueron analizables. El 96% eran mayores de 5 años de edad al momento del diagnóstico. La mayoría de los factores de riesgo descritos en la literatura eran observables en estos pacientes (múltiples cirugías, malformaciones neurológicas y nefrourológicas, intervenciones quirúrgicas antes del año de edad y cateterismo vesical repetido). Luego de la exposición, las manifestaciones cutáneo-mucosas fueron las más frecuentes (52%), seguidas por las respiratorias (36%). El 100% de los pacientes estaban sensibilizados al látex. Conclusión: La sensibilización y alergia al látex es un problema relevante en niños con factores de riesgo. Los resultados mostrados plantean importantes desafíos en relación con medidas preventivas.

Introduction: The prevalence of latex sensitisation varies according to the population studied. There are various risk factors that increase latex sensitisation, such as genetic risk, atopy, and multiple surgeries. Objective: To characterise patients referred to an Immunology Unit with suspected latex allergy, and to analyse their clinical features and risk factors. Patients and method: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted on children suspected of latex allergy. Their medical records were reviewed in order to assess symptoms with contact or exposure to latex materials. Known risk factors to latex sensitisation, such as pathologies requiring repeated surgery (spina bifida, myelomeningocele, scoliosis and nephro-urological alterations), atopy (rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis) were investigated. A prick test and/or specific IgE to latex were also performed. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed to find associations between symptoms triggered by exposure to latex with underlying diseases and other risk conditions. Results: A total of 106 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 50 were evaluable. At diagnosis 96% of patients were older than five years. Most of the risk factors described were observable in these patients, such as multiple surgeries, neurological and nephro-urological malformations, surgery before one year-old, and repeated bladder catheterisation. After latex exposure, mucous cutaneous manifestations were the most common (52%), followed by respiratory symptoms (36%). All patients were sensitised and allergic to latex. Conclusion: Latex allergy is a significant problem in children with risk factors. The results shown in this study raise important challenges for preventive measures and awareness.

Globos de látex de caucho natural: objetos peligros a desterrar de las instituciones de salud / Natural rubber latex balloons: dangerous objects to be banned from health institutions

Los globos de látex de caucho natural y los guantes de examinación del mismo material inflados como globos, que se entregan a los pacientes para aliviar el estrés de la atención sanitaria en las instituciones de salud tanto públicas como privadas, pueden provocar reacciones de hipersensibilidad de tipo I y son una de las causas más comunes de aspiración fatal. La suelta de globos contaminan el ambiente y agravan la extinción de la fauna y de la vida marina. Los pacientes sensibilizados o alérgicos al látex que participan en los festejos donde se utilizan globos de látex corren el riesgo de una reacción anafiláctica, potencialmente fatal. Aconsejarles no concurrir a dichos eventos, implica impedirles el disfrute de las actividades recreativas que es un derecho de la infancia manifestado en la Declaración de los Derechos del Niño. Muchos hospitales de países desarrollados ya cuentan con una política de prohibición de los globos de látex en sus instituciones, que podría replicarse en nuestro medio por las ventajas que conlleva y su muy bajo costo de implementación (AU)

Natural rubber latex balloons and examining gloves of the same material blown up as balloons to entertain patients to alleviate the stress of care at public and private health institutions, may cause reactions of type-1 hypersensitivity and are the most common cause of fatal asphyxia. Balloons that are released up into the air contaminate the environment and aggravate the extinction of fauna and marine life. Patients who are sensitized or allergic to latex and participate in celebrations in which latex balloons are used are at risk of a potentially fatal anaphylactic reaction. To advise them not to participate in these events means to stop them from enjoying recreational activities which is a right manifested in the Declaration of the Rights of the Child. In many hospitals in developed countries a policy of prohibition of latex gloves is already in place. This prohibition may be replicated in our environment considering its advantages and very low cost of implementation (AU)

Prevalencia de alergia al látex en una población de pacientes con diagnóstico de mielomeningocele / Prevalence of latex allergy in a population of patients diagnosed with myelomeningocele

Introducción: La alergia al látex se encuentra dentro de las primeras causas de anafilaxia en el quirófano. La prevalencia de esta enfermedad es más elevada en pacientes con mielomenigocele. Existen escasos datos epidemiológicos en pacientes argentinos. Objetivo: Estimar la prevalencia de la sensibilidad y de la alergia al látex en una población de pacientes con mielomeningocele y describir los factores de riesgo asociados. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio descriptivo, transversal, observacional. Se analizaron los antecedentes familiares y personales de alergia, el número de procedimientos quirúrgicos, la historia de síntomas ante el contacto con látex o alimentos con reactividad cruzada, el recuento de eosinófilos, la inmunoglobulina E total y la inmunoglobulina E específica mediante pruebas serológicas y cutáneas para el látex, los aeroalérgenos y las frutas con reactividad cruzada. Resultados: Se evaluaron 82 pacientes con diagnóstico de mielomeningocele, 41 del sexo masculino (50%), con edad promedio de 15,3 ± 7,66 años. Del total de los pacientes, 2 no realizaron las pruebas cutáneas y serológicas. De los 80 restantes, 16 (19,51%) presentaban alergia al látex, 46 (57,5%) no eran alérgicos y 18 (22%) fueron sensibles pero no alérgicos. Se observó que haber tenido más de 5 cirugías representaba un factor de riesgo asociado a alergia al látex (p= 0,035). No se encontró una asociación significativa con el resto de las variables evaluadas. Conclusión: El estudio estima que la prevalencia de alergia al látex en esta población de pacientes es de 19,51% y que el factor de riesgo más importante para el desarrollo de esta patología es el antecedente de haber sido sometido a más de 5 intervenciones.

Introduction: Latex allergy is one of the main reasons of anaphylaxis in the operating room. The prevalence of this condition is higher among patients with myelomeningocele. Epidemiological data obtained from Argentine patients is scarce. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of latex sensitivity and latex allergy in a population of patients with myelomeningocele and to describe associated risk factors. Population and Methods: Descriptive, crosssectional, observational study. Family and personal history of allergy, number of surgeries, history of symptoms caused by having been in contact withlatex or cross-reactive foods, eosinophil count, measurement of total immunoglobulin E and specific immunoglobulin E levels by means of skin and serologic testing for latex, aeroallergens and cross-reactive fruit. Results: Eighty-two patients diagnosed with myelomeningocele were assessed: 41 were males and their average age was 15.3 ? 7.66 years old. Out of all patients, two did not complete skin and serologic testing. Among the remaining 80 patients, 16 (19.51%) had latex allergy, 46 (57.5%) were not allergic, and 18 (22%) showed sensitivity but not allergy. Having undergone more than five surgeries was a risk factor associated with latex allergy (p= 0.035). No significant association was observed with the remaining outcome measures. Conclusion: According to this study, the prevalence of latex allergy in this population of patients is 19.51% and the most important risk factor for this condition is a history of having undergone more than five surgeries.

Alergia al látex, puesta al día / Latex allergy, uptodate

El látex o caucho natural es un producto vegetal que se obtiene de la savia de la Hevea brasiliensis. Ampliamente utilizado para la fabricación de productos de uso doméstico (guantes, preservativos, globos, etc.) y del área de la salud, donde se estima que el 50% de los artículos médicos contienen látex. La alergia al látex es un problema de salud mundial. Se estima que la prevalencia de sensibilización al látex en población general es del 1%. Clínicamente, puede generar una reacción de hipersensibilidad tipo I, IgE mediada, en respuesta a las proteínas del látex que se manifiesta como una urticaria hasta la anafilaxia. También se describe dermatitis de contacto irritativa y la dermatitis de contacto alérgica, 12 a 96 horas luego del contacto, por una reacción de hipersensibilidad retardada tipo IV, secundaria a los aditivos del látex. El diagnóstico se basa en la sospecha clínica, confirmado con pruebas cutáneas y medición de IgEs específicas. Realizar una anamnesis que permita sospechar una alergia al látex y si se determina que el paciente tiene riesgo, realizar el estudio complementario para confirmar el diagnóstico. El enfrentamiento se basa en la prevención de la exposición y el tratamiento de la reacción aguda. Es necesario conocer los alérgenos y procesos implicados en la alergia al látex pues de este modo se podrá sospechar e identificar a pacientes o funcionarios que puedan sufrir o estar en riesgo de presentarla, disminuyendo de este modo las posibles complicaciones.

Latex or natural rubber is a vegetable product which is obtained from the sap of the Hevea brasiliensis. It is widely used to manufacture domestic products (gloves, condoms, balloons, etc.) and used in the health area, where it is estimated that 50% of medical articles contain latex. Latex allergy is a global health problem. It is estimated that the prevalence of latex sensitization is 1% in the general population. The clinical presentation can be a type I hypersensitivity reaction, IgE mediated, in response to latex proteins, manifested as a rash or even as an anaphylaxis. Irritant contact dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis, 12 to 96 hours after contact, is also described, due to a delayed type IV hypersensitivity reaction, secondary to latex additives. The diagnosis of latex allergy is based on clinical suspicion and confirmed with skin tests measuring specific IgEs. Management is based on the exposure prevention and treatment of the acute reaction. A detailed anamnesis must be made to suspect a latex allergy and if the patient is at risk of presenting it, perform additional study to confirm the diagnosis. It is necessary to know the allergens and processes involved in latex allergy, to be able to suspect and identify patients or staff who may suffer or be at risk of presenting it, thus reducing potential complications.

A novel arctigenin-containing latex glove prevents latex allergy by inhibiting type I/IV allergic reactions / 中国天然药物

The present study aimed at developing a natural compound with anti-allergic effect and stability under latex glove manufacturing conditions and investigating whether its anti-allergic effect is maintained after its addition into the latex. The effects of nine natural compounds on growth of the RBL-2H3 cells and mouse primary spleen lymphocytes were determined using MTT assay. The compounds included glycyrrhizin, osthole, tetrandrine, tea polyphenol, catechin, arctigenin, oleanolic acid, baicalin and oxymatrine. An ELISA assay was used for the in vitro anti-type I/IV allergy screening; in this process β-hexosaminidase, histamine, and IL-4 released from RBL-2H3 cell lines and IFN-γ and IL-2 released from mouse primary spleen lymphocytes were taken as screening indices. The physical stability of eight natural compounds and the dissolubility of arctigenin, selected based on the in vitro pharnacodynamaic screening and the stability evaluation, were detected by HPLC. The in vivo pharmacodynamic confirmation of arctigenin and final latex product was evaluated with a passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) model and an allergen-specific skin response model. Nine natural compounds showed minor growth inhibition on RBL-2H3 cells and mouse primary spleen lymphocytes. Baicalin and arctigenin had the best anti-type I and IV allergic effects among the natural compounds based on the in vitro pharmacodynamic screening. Arctigenin and catechin had the best physical stability under different manufacturing conditions. Arctigenin was the selected for further evaluation and proven to have anti-type I and IV allergic effects in vivo in a dose-dependent manner. The final product of the arctigenin-containing latex glove had anti-type I and IV allergic effects in vivo which were mainly attributed to arctigenin as proved from the dissolubility results. Arctigenin showed anti-type I and IV allergic effects in vitro and in vivo, with a good stability under latex glove manufacturing conditions, and a persistent anti-allergic effect after being added into the latex to prevent latex allergy.

Alergia al látex en el período perioperatorio / Latex allergy in the perioperative period

Latex or natural rubber latex is a processed plant-based product, extracted from the tropical tree Hevea Brasiliensis. This raw material is widely used in about 40.000 medical and daily-used products. Latex allergy is a relevant pathology in surgical environments that arose after the establishment of universal precautions during the nineties. Risk groups include health-care workers and children with spine bifida who have a prevalence ranging between 2.9-17 percent and 30-70 percent, respectively. Latex allergy occurs in a variety of ways in health facilities including hypersensitivity reaction type IV or type I. In the former, chemical substances added to latex trigger the allergic reactions; where allergic dermatitis is the most-frequently found case. In the latter, the reactions are triggered by the contact with latex proteins causing from urticarial to anaphylactic shock and death. Diagnosis of latex allergy is based on a clinical history and/or physical examination associated with a confirmatory test as prick test (latex allergy type I) or cutaneous patches (latex allergy type IV). Nowadays, there is no definitive cure for the latex allergy and its treatment is based on allergen avoidance.

El látex o caucho natural es un producto vegetal procesado que se obtiene a partir del árbol tropical Hevea Brasiliensis. Esta materia prima es ampliamente usada, estando presente en hasta 40.000 productos médicos y de uso diario. La alergia al látex es una patología relevante en el ámbito quirúrgico, que surgió posterior a la instauración de las precauciones universales en la década del 90. Dentro de los grupos de riesgo se encuentran trabajadores de la salud y pacientes con espina bífida con una prevalencia que oscila entre 2,9 a 17 por ciento y 30 a 70 por ciento, respectivamente. La presentación clínica de alergia al látex tiene un espectro amplio, pudiendo presentarse como reacciones por hipersensibilidad tipo IV o tipo I. En el primer grupo, las reacciones son gatilladas por los químicos adicionados al látex, siendo la dermatitis alérgica de contacto su presentación más frecuente. En el segundo grupo, las reacciones son secundarias al contacto con proteínas del látex, pudiéndose manifestar desde urticaria hasta shock anafiláctico y muerte. El diagnóstico de alergia al látex se basa en una historia clínica y/o examen físico compatible asociado a un examen confirmatorio, como el prick test (alergia al látex tipo I) y el parche cutáneo (alergia al látex tipo IV). Actualmente no existe una cura definitiva para la alergia al látex y su tratamiento se basa en evitar la exposición al alérgeno.